Park Avenue vs Pink Lily.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
Park Avenue scores higher on walkability (20/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pink Lily (955) sits above Park Avenue (953). Pink Lily skews owner-occupied (78%), Park Avenue runs more rental-dense (64% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Pink Lily edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 953). Pink Lily also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Park Avenue or Pink Lily have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pink Lily scores 955 vs 953 in Park Avenue. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Park Avenue or Pink Lily?
Park Avenue scores 20/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Park Avenue against another suburb