Side by sideSuburb comparison

Paytens Bridge vs Gooloogong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Paytens Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Paytens Bridge (937) sits above Gooloogong (934). Gooloogong skews owner-occupied (78%), Paytens Bridge runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Paytens Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 934). Paytens Bridge also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 66%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPaytens Bridge vs Gooloogong

Common questions

Does Paytens Bridge or Gooloogong have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Paytens Bridge scores 937 vs 934 in Gooloogong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Paytens Bridge
Metric
Gooloogong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$208/wk
$130/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$208/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
30.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
109
Population
408
36
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
18
937
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).