Side by sideSuburb comparison

Peacock Creek vs Joes Box.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Peacock Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Peacock Creek (816) sits above Joes Box (784). Joes Box skews owner-occupied (57%), Peacock Creek runs more rental-dense (23% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Peacock Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (816 vs 784). Peacock Creek also has a higher family-household share (46% vs 21%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPeacock Creek vs Joes Box

Common questions

Does Peacock Creek or Joes Box have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Peacock Creek scores 816 vs 784 in Joes Box. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Peacock Creek
Metric
Joes Box

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$465/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$185/wk
23.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
23
Population
24
59
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
816
Avg ICSEA
784

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).