Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pinjarra Hills vs Westlake.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Westlake edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Westlake scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Westlake skews owner-occupied (88%), Pinjarra Hills runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Westlake has a heavier family-household mix (88% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsPinjarra Hills vs Westlake

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Pinjarra Hills or Westlake?

Westlake scores 36/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Pinjarra Hills
Metric
Westlake

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$540/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$440/wk
$490/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
0
55
Bike score
100
771
Population
4,547
70
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1094
Avg ICSEA
1094

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).