Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pipeclay vs Lower Pappinbarra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pipeclay edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pipeclay (916) sits above Lower Pappinbarra (915).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pipeclay edges out on average school ICSEA (916 vs 915). Pipeclay also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPipeclay vs Lower Pappinbarra

Common questions

Does Pipeclay or Lower Pappinbarra have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pipeclay scores 916 vs 915 in Lower Pappinbarra. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pipeclay
Metric
Lower Pappinbarra

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$131/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
102
Population
136
51
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
6
916
Avg ICSEA
915

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).