Side by sideSuburb comparison

Port Paterson vs Commissariat Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Commissariat Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Commissariat Point (845) sits above Port Paterson (818). Commissariat Point skews owner-occupied (91%), Port Paterson runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Commissariat Point edges out on average school ICSEA (845 vs 818). Port Paterson also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPort Paterson vs Commissariat Point

Common questions

Does Port Paterson or Commissariat Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Commissariat Point scores 845 vs 818 in Port Paterson. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Port Paterson
Metric
Commissariat Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$425/wk
$288/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
73
Population
243
45
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
10
818
Avg ICSEA
845

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).