Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pretty Gully vs Lower Peacock.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pretty Gully edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pretty Gully (831) sits above Lower Peacock (781).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pretty Gully edges out on average school ICSEA (831 vs 781).

Common questionsPretty Gully vs Lower Peacock

Common questions

Does Pretty Gully or Lower Peacock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pretty Gully scores 831 vs 781 in Lower Peacock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pretty Gully
Metric
Lower Peacock

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$204/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$125/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4,359
Population
5
54
Median age
67

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
831
Avg ICSEA
781

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).