Side by sideSuburb comparison

Primrose Sands vs Connellys Marsh.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Connellys Marsh edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Connellys Marsh (958) sits above Primrose Sands (939). Connellys Marsh skews owner-occupied (100%), Primrose Sands runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Connellys Marsh edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 939). Connellys Marsh also has a higher family-household share (77% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPrimrose Sands vs Connellys Marsh

Common questions

Does Primrose Sands or Connellys Marsh have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Connellys Marsh scores 958 vs 939 in Primrose Sands. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Primrose Sands
Metric
Connellys Marsh

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$281/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,209
Population
40
54
Median age
69

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
3
939
Avg ICSEA
958

Climate

586 mm
Annual rainfall
586 mm
21.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
21.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).