Side by sideSuburb comparison

Railton vs Acacia Hills.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Railton scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Acacia Hills (952) sits above Railton (936).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Acacia Hills edges out on average school ICSEA (952 vs 936).

Common questionsRailton vs Acacia Hills

Common questions

Does Railton or Acacia Hills have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Acacia Hills scores 952 vs 936 in Railton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Railton or Acacia Hills?

Railton scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Railton
Metric
Acacia Hills

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$208/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$177/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
18.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,079
Population
4,276
45
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
4
936
Avg ICSEA
952

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).