Side by sideSuburb comparison

Redcliffe vs Ascot.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Redcliffe edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Redcliffe (1023) sits above Ascot (1022). Ascot skews owner-occupied (67%), Redcliffe runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Redcliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (1023 vs 1022).

Common questionsRedcliffe vs Ascot

Common questions

Does Redcliffe or Ascot have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Redcliffe scores 1023 vs 1022 in Ascot. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Redcliffe
Metric
Ascot

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

24
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
5,030
Population
3,095
38
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1023
Avg ICSEA
1022

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).