Side by sideSuburb comparison

Reddestone vs Rangers Valley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Reddestone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Reddestone (925) sits above Rangers Valley (923). Reddestone skews owner-occupied (75%), Rangers Valley runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Reddestone edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 923).

Common questionsReddestone vs Rangers Valley

Common questions

Does Reddestone or Rangers Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Reddestone scores 925 vs 923 in Rangers Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Reddestone
Metric
Rangers Valley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$865/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$191/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
55.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
59
Population
27
59
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
2
925
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).