Side by sideSuburb comparison

Robin Hill vs Windradyne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Windradyne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Windradyne scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Robin Hill skews owner-occupied (95%), Windradyne runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Robin Hill has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsRobin Hill vs Windradyne

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Robin Hill or Windradyne?

Windradyne scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Robin Hill
Metric
Windradyne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$234/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
3.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
20
30
Bike score
100
925
Population
3,309
48
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

17
Schools nearby
17
982
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).