Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rocky Camp vs Mount Mcintyre.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rocky Camp edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rocky Camp (951) sits above Mount Mcintyre (948). Rocky Camp skews owner-occupied (100%), Mount Mcintyre runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rocky Camp edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 948).

Common questionsRocky Camp vs Mount Mcintyre

Common questions

Does Rocky Camp or Mount Mcintyre have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rocky Camp scores 951 vs 948 in Mount Mcintyre. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rocky Camp
Metric
Mount Mcintyre

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$175/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$155/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
133
Population
70
50
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
7
951
Avg ICSEA
948

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).