Rosa Glen vs Warner Glen.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rosa Glen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Rosa Glen scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rosa Glen (1053) sits above Warner Glen (1038). Rosa Glen skews owner-occupied (76%), Warner Glen runs more rental-dense (58% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Rosa Glen edges out on average school ICSEA (1053 vs 1038). Warner Glen also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Rosa Glen or Warner Glen have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rosa Glen scores 1053 vs 1038 in Warner Glen. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Rosa Glen or Warner Glen?
Rosa Glen scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Rosa Glen against another suburb