Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rose Park vs Norwood.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $3,115,000 and $1,700,000.

Norwood (median $1,700,000) is roughly 83% cheaper to buy into than Rose Park ($3,115,000). Over the past year, Rose Park (+15.4%) ran 33.7 percentage points ahead of Norwood (-18.3%) on house-price growth.

Norwood scores higher on walkability (44/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rose Park (1116) sits above Norwood (1110). Rose Park skews owner-occupied (71%), Norwood runs more rental-dense (51% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Norwood is the lower entry point at $1,700,000 median, 83% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Norwood delivers the better gross yield (2.28% vs 1.50%), but Rose Park has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Rose Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1116 vs 1110). Rose Park also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRose Park vs Norwood

Common questions

Is Rose Park or Norwood cheaper to buy in?

Norwood has the lower median house price at $1,700,000, roughly 83% below Rose Park ($3,115,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Rose Park or Norwood?

Over the past 12 months, Rose Park grew +15.4% vs -18.3% in Norwood, a gap of 33.7 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Rose Park or Norwood have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rose Park scores 1116 vs 1110 in Norwood. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Rose Park or Norwood?

Norwood scores 100/100 on walkability vs 44/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Rose Park or Norwood?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.28% in Norwood vs 1.50% in Rose Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Rose Park
Metric
Norwood

Price & Market

$3,115,000
Median house
$1,700,000
$340,560
Median unit
$340,560
+15.4%
Annual growth (house)
-18.3%
Days on market

Rental

$900/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$745/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$585/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
51.0%
26.0%
Renter occupied
44.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

44
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,375
Population
6,354
44
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1116
Avg ICSEA
1110

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).