Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ross vs Mount Johns.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $767,500 and $685,000. Mount Johns edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Mount Johns (median $685,000) is roughly 12% cheaper to buy into than Ross ($767,500).

Ross skews owner-occupied (55%), Mount Johns runs more rental-dense (26% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Mount Johns is the lower entry point at $685,000 median, 12% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Mount Johns offers the higher gross rental yield (2.58% vs 1.69%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsRoss vs Mount Johns

Common questions

Is Ross or Mount Johns cheaper to buy in?

Mount Johns has the lower median house price at $685,000, roughly 12% below Ross ($767,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Ross or Mount Johns?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.58% in Mount Johns vs 1.69% in Ross. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Ross
Metric
Mount Johns

Price & Market

$767,500
Median house
$685,000
$365,040
Median unit
$336,500
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$345/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
26.0%
39.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
50
806
Population
541
39
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
884
Avg ICSEA
884

Climate

302 mm
Annual rainfall
302 mm
36.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
36.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).