Side by sideSuburb comparison

Round Mountain vs Tanglewood.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Round Mountain edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Round Mountain (1034) sits above Tanglewood (1030). Tanglewood skews owner-occupied (87%), Round Mountain runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Round Mountain edges out on average school ICSEA (1034 vs 1030).

Common questionsRound Mountain vs Tanglewood

Common questions

Does Round Mountain or Tanglewood have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Round Mountain scores 1034 vs 1030 in Tanglewood. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Round Mountain
Metric
Tanglewood

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$450/wk
$338/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$463/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
0
148
Population
104
50
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
9
1034
Avg ICSEA
1030

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).