Side by sideSuburb comparison

Russell Vale vs Bellambi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bellambi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bellambi scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Russell Vale skews owner-occupied (78%), Bellambi runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Russell Vale has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsRussell Vale vs Bellambi

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Russell Vale or Bellambi?

Bellambi scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Russell Vale
Metric
Bellambi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$252/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
22.0%
Renter occupied
53.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,593
Population
4,039
39
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1023
Avg ICSEA
1023

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).