Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ryhope vs Fassifern.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Fassifern edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fassifern (975) sits above Ryhope (963). Ryhope skews owner-occupied (100%), Fassifern runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Fassifern edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 963). Ryhope also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRyhope vs Fassifern

Common questions

Does Ryhope or Fassifern have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fassifern scores 975 vs 963 in Ryhope. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ryhope
Metric
Fassifern

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$345/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$345/wk
$293/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$310/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
30
0
Bike score
90
35
Population
586
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
963
Avg ICSEA
975

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).