Side by sideSuburb comparison

Scaddan vs Monjingup.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Monjingup edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Monjingup (912) sits above Scaddan (851). Monjingup skews owner-occupied (84%), Scaddan runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Monjingup edges out on average school ICSEA (912 vs 851). Monjingup also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsScaddan vs Monjingup

Common questions

Does Scaddan or Monjingup have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Monjingup scores 912 vs 851 in Scaddan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Scaddan
Metric
Monjingup

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$115/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$265/wk
$98/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
96
Population
394
36
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
9
851
Avg ICSEA
912

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).