Side by sideSuburb comparison

Seppings vs Spencer Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Seppings skews owner-occupied (78%), Spencer Park runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Seppings has a heavier family-household mix (70% vs 58%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Seppings
Metric
Spencer Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$290/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
39.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
Transit score
30
Bike score
177
Population
3,445
43
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
994
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).