Side by sideSuburb comparison

Shannondale vs Coutts Crossing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coutts Crossing edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coutts Crossing (925) sits above Shannondale (923). Coutts Crossing skews owner-occupied (83%), Shannondale runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coutts Crossing edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 923).

Common questionsShannondale vs Coutts Crossing

Common questions

Does Shannondale or Coutts Crossing have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coutts Crossing scores 925 vs 923 in Shannondale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Shannondale
Metric
Coutts Crossing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
76
Population
1,053
36
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
13
923
Avg ICSEA
925

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).