Side by sideSuburb comparison

Six Mile Swamp vs Kippenduff.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kippenduff edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kippenduff (884) sits above Six Mile Swamp (876).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kippenduff edges out on average school ICSEA (884 vs 876).

Common questionsSix Mile Swamp vs Kippenduff

Common questions

Does Six Mile Swamp or Kippenduff have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kippenduff scores 884 vs 876 in Six Mile Swamp. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Six Mile Swamp
Metric
Kippenduff

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$204/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$204/wk
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4,359
Population
17
54
Median age
66

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
9
876
Avg ICSEA
884

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).