Side by sideSuburb comparison

South Lake Grace vs North Lake Grace.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. South Lake Grace edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving South Lake Grace (1005) sits above North Lake Grace (999). South Lake Grace skews owner-occupied (186%), North Lake Grace runs more rental-dense (90% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

South Lake Grace edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 999). South Lake Grace also has a higher family-household share (114% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsSouth Lake Grace vs North Lake Grace

Common questions

Does South Lake Grace or North Lake Grace have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), South Lake Grace scores 1005 vs 999 in North Lake Grace. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

South Lake Grace
Metric
North Lake Grace

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
186.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
23
Population
23
52
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
1005
Avg ICSEA
999

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).