Side by sideSuburb comparison

Spring Mountain vs Glen Elgin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glen Elgin edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glen Elgin (935) sits above Spring Mountain (930). Glen Elgin skews owner-occupied (157%), Spring Mountain runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glen Elgin edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 930). Glen Elgin also has a higher family-household share (114% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsSpring Mountain vs Glen Elgin

Common questions

Does Spring Mountain or Glen Elgin have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glen Elgin scores 935 vs 930 in Spring Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Spring Mountain
Metric
Glen Elgin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$274/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$191/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
157.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
20
Population
32
50
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
6
930
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).