Side by sideSuburb comparison

Springfield vs Torrens Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $6,572,500 and $2,340,000.

Torrens Park (median $2,340,000) is roughly 181% cheaper to buy into than Springfield ($6,572,500). Over the past year, Torrens Park (+4%) ran 4.0 percentage points ahead of Springfield (0%) on house-price growth.

Springfield scores higher on walkability (8/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Springfield (1130) sits above Torrens Park (1112). Springfield skews owner-occupied (91%), Torrens Park runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Torrens Park is the lower entry point at $2,340,000 median, 181% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Torrens Park carries both higher gross yield (1.56% vs 0.63%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Springfield edges out on average school ICSEA (1130 vs 1112). Springfield also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsSpringfield vs Torrens Park

Common questions

Is Springfield or Torrens Park cheaper to buy in?

Torrens Park has the lower median house price at $2,340,000, roughly 181% below Springfield ($6,572,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Springfield or Torrens Park?

Over the past 12 months, Torrens Park grew +4% vs 0% in Springfield, a gap of 4.0 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Springfield or Torrens Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Springfield scores 1130 vs 1112 in Torrens Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Springfield or Torrens Park?

Springfield scores 8/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Springfield or Torrens Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 1.56% in Torrens Park vs 0.63% in Springfield. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Springfield
Metric
Torrens Park

Price & Market

$6,572,500
Median house
$2,340,000
$343,440
Median unit
$343,440
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+4.0%
Days on market

Rental

$800/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$700/wk
$700/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

8
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
548
Population
2,687
48
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1130
Avg ICSEA
1112

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).