Side by sideSuburb comparison

St George Ranges vs Geegully Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Geegully Creek skews owner-occupied (75%), St George Ranges runs more rental-dense (1% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

St George Ranges
Metric
Geegully Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$100/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$100/wk
$70/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$85/wk
1.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
92.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
1,133
Population
9
25
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
Avg ICSEA
742

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

Compare St George Ranges against another suburb

Or compare any two suburbs nationally →