Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stake Hill vs Lakelands.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lakelands edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Lakelands scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Stake Hill skews owner-occupied (95%), Lakelands runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stake Hill has a heavier family-household mix (91% vs 80%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsStake Hill vs Lakelands

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Stake Hill or Lakelands?

Lakelands scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Stake Hill
Metric
Lakelands

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
12
0
Transit score
20
65
Bike score
100
469
Population
6,171
45
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
992
Avg ICSEA
992

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).