Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stirling Range National Park vs North Stirlings.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stirling Range National Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stirling Range National Park (1018) sits above North Stirlings (999).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stirling Range National Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1018 vs 999).

Common questionsStirling Range National Park vs North Stirlings

Common questions

Does Stirling Range National Park or North Stirlings have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stirling Range National Park scores 1018 vs 999 in North Stirlings. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Stirling Range National Park
Metric
North Stirlings

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$179/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$25/wk
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
730
Population
26
46
Median age
29

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
1018
Avg ICSEA
999

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).