Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stockinbingal vs Combaning.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Combaning edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Combaning (962) sits above Stockinbingal (944). Stockinbingal skews owner-occupied (89%), Combaning runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Combaning edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 944). Combaning also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsStockinbingal vs Combaning

Common questions

Does Stockinbingal or Combaning have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Combaning scores 962 vs 944 in Stockinbingal. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Stockinbingal
Metric
Combaning

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$155/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$155/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$127/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
347
Population
100
53
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
5
944
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).