Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stockrington vs Seahampton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Seahampton edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Seahampton (989) sits above Stockrington (977). Seahampton skews owner-occupied (88%), Stockrington runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Seahampton edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 977). Stockrington also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsStockrington vs Seahampton

Common questions

Does Stockrington or Seahampton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Seahampton scores 989 vs 977 in Stockrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Stockrington
Metric
Seahampton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$370/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$403/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
15
92
Population
292
37
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
977
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).