Side by sideSuburb comparison

Storm King vs Kyoomba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Storm King edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Storm King (973) sits above Kyoomba (965). Storm King skews owner-occupied (108%), Kyoomba runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Storm King edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 965).

Common questionsStorm King vs Kyoomba

Common questions

Does Storm King or Kyoomba have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Storm King scores 973 vs 965 in Kyoomba. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Storm King
Metric
Kyoomba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$275/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$245/wk
108.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
106
Population
83
55
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
5
973
Avg ICSEA
965

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).