Side by sideSuburb comparison

Swanbourne vs Claremont North.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Claremont North edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Claremont North scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsSwanbourne vs Claremont North

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Swanbourne or Claremont North?

Claremont North scores 100/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Swanbourne
Metric
Claremont North

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$460/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$460/wk
$470/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$391/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
25.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
90
100
Bike score
100
4,592
Population
18,863
38
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1154
Avg ICSEA
1154

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).