Side by sideSuburb comparison

Takilberan vs New Moonta.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. New Moonta edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving New Moonta (943) sits above Takilberan (938). Takilberan skews owner-occupied (100%), New Moonta runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

New Moonta edges out on average school ICSEA (943 vs 938). Takilberan also has a higher family-household share (109% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTakilberan vs New Moonta

Common questions

Does Takilberan or New Moonta have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), New Moonta scores 943 vs 938 in Takilberan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Takilberan
Metric
New Moonta

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
47
Population
78
57
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
8
938
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).