Side by sideSuburb comparison

Talbingo vs Batlow.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Batlow edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Batlow scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Batlow skews owner-occupied (76%), Talbingo runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsTalbingo vs Batlow

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Talbingo or Batlow?

Batlow scores 24/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Talbingo
Metric
Batlow

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$190/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
24
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
40
224
Population
1,270
61
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
931
Avg ICSEA
931

Climate

Annual rainfall
585 mm
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).