Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tangmangaroo vs Laverstock.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Laverstock edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Laverstock (1001) sits above Tangmangaroo (984).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Laverstock edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 984).

Common questionsTangmangaroo vs Laverstock

Common questions

Does Tangmangaroo or Laverstock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Laverstock scores 1001 vs 984 in Tangmangaroo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tangmangaroo
Metric
Laverstock

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$298/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
Owner occupied
91.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
13,693
Population
30
42
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
5
984
Avg ICSEA
1001

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).