Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tanwood vs Warrenmang.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Warrenmang edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Warrenmang (959) sits above Tanwood (947). Tanwood skews owner-occupied (150%), Warrenmang runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Warrenmang edges out on average school ICSEA (959 vs 947). Warrenmang also has a higher family-household share (143% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTanwood vs Warrenmang

Common questions

Does Tanwood or Warrenmang have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Warrenmang scores 959 vs 947 in Tanwood. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tanwood
Metric
Warrenmang

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$185/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$185/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$155/wk
150.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
15
Population
16
60
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
947
Avg ICSEA
959

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).