Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tara vs The Gums.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Tara scores higher on walkability (70/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving The Gums (921) sits above Tara (843).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

The Gums edges out on average school ICSEA (921 vs 843).

Common questionsTara vs The Gums

Common questions

Does Tara or The Gums have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), The Gums scores 921 vs 843 in Tara. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Tara or The Gums?

Tara scores 70/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Tara
Metric
The Gums

Price & Market

$180,000
Median house
$123,840
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$125/wk
Owner occupied
60.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

70
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,178
Population
165
48
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
843
Avg ICSEA
921

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).