Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tarpeena vs Dismal Swamp.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tarpeena edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tarpeena (961) sits above Dismal Swamp (957). Tarpeena skews owner-occupied (87%), Dismal Swamp runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tarpeena edges out on average school ICSEA (961 vs 957).

Common questionsTarpeena vs Dismal Swamp

Common questions

Does Tarpeena or Dismal Swamp have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tarpeena scores 961 vs 957 in Dismal Swamp. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tarpeena
Metric
Dismal Swamp

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$287/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
392
Population
63
52
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
15
961
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).