Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tarranyurk vs Cannum.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tarranyurk edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tarranyurk (967) sits above Cannum (961). Cannum skews owner-occupied (79%), Tarranyurk runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tarranyurk edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 961).

Common questionsTarranyurk vs Cannum

Common questions

Does Tarranyurk or Cannum have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tarranyurk scores 967 vs 961 in Cannum. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tarranyurk
Metric
Cannum

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$165/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$135/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$110/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
36
Population
45
37
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
4
967
Avg ICSEA
961

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).