Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tarrawanna vs Fernhill.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Tarrawanna skews owner-occupied (64%), Fernhill runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

Tarrawanna
Metric
Fernhill

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$190/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
45.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
50.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
4
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
2,184
Population
987
48
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1019
Avg ICSEA
1019

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).