Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tarrenlea vs Coleraine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coleraine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Coleraine scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Coleraine skews owner-occupied (80%), Tarrenlea runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tarrenlea has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 54%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsTarrenlea vs Coleraine

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Tarrenlea or Coleraine?

Coleraine scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Tarrenlea
Metric
Coleraine

Price & Market

Median house
$245,000
Median unit
$110,880
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$145/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$145/wk
$123/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$140/wk
42.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
25
25
Population
1,062
49
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
18
984
Avg ICSEA
984

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).