Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tarrone vs Crossley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Crossley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Crossley (1014) sits above Tarrone (1010). Crossley skews owner-occupied (89%), Tarrone runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Crossley edges out on average school ICSEA (1014 vs 1010). Crossley also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTarrone vs Crossley

Common questions

Does Tarrone or Crossley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Crossley scores 1014 vs 1010 in Tarrone. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tarrone
Metric
Crossley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$263/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$263/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
69
Population
235
39
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
19
1010
Avg ICSEA
1014

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).