Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tatachilla vs Seaford Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tatachilla edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tatachilla (994) sits above Seaford Heights (968). Tatachilla skews owner-occupied (89%), Seaford Heights runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tatachilla edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 968).

Common questionsTatachilla vs Seaford Heights

Common questions

Does Tatachilla or Seaford Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tatachilla scores 994 vs 968 in Seaford Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tatachilla
Metric
Seaford Heights

Price & Market

Median house
$660,000
Median unit
$247,680
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
-21.6%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$650/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$380/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
100
231
Population
1,079
45
Median age
29

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
20
994
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).