Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tatham vs Codrington.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Codrington edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Codrington (946) sits above Tatham (929). Codrington skews owner-occupied (114%), Tatham runs more rental-dense (92% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Codrington edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 929). Codrington also has a higher family-household share (129% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTatham vs Codrington

Common questions

Does Tatham or Codrington have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Codrington scores 946 vs 929 in Tatham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tatham
Metric
Codrington

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
114.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
225
Population
83
41
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
929
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).