Side by sideSuburb comparison

The Gums vs Hannaford.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hannaford edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Hannaford (941) sits above The Gums (921). Hannaford skews owner-occupied (76%), The Gums runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Hannaford edges out on average school ICSEA (941 vs 921). Hannaford also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsThe Gums vs Hannaford

Common questions

Does The Gums or Hannaford have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Hannaford scores 941 vs 921 in The Gums. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

The Gums
Metric
Hannaford

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$125/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$165/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
165
Population
135
45
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
921
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).