The Ponds vs Stanhope Gardens.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stanhope Gardens edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Stanhope Gardens scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stanhope Gardens (1098) sits above The Ponds (1091).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Stanhope Gardens edges out on average school ICSEA (1098 vs 1091).
Common questions
Does The Ponds or Stanhope Gardens have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stanhope Gardens scores 1098 vs 1091 in The Ponds. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, The Ponds or Stanhope Gardens?
Stanhope Gardens scores 100/100 on walkability vs 30/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare The Ponds against another suburb