Side by sideSuburb comparison

Thirldene vs Woodsreef.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Thirldene skews owner-occupied (67%), Woodsreef runs more rental-dense (40% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Thirldene has a heavier family-household mix (67% vs 55%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Thirldene
Metric
Woodsreef

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$187/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$187/wk
$125/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
40.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
34
Population
59
25
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
2
914
Avg ICSEA
914

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).