Side by sideSuburb comparison

Thrington vs Cunliffe.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cunliffe edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cunliffe (944) sits above Thrington (933).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cunliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (944 vs 933).

Common questionsThrington vs Cunliffe

Common questions

Does Thrington or Cunliffe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cunliffe scores 944 vs 933 in Thrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Thrington
Metric
Cunliffe

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$193/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$120/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
70.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
23
Population
50
44
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
933
Avg ICSEA
944

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).