Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tinamba West vs Maffra West Upper.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Maffra West Upper edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Maffra West Upper (973) sits above Tinamba West (968). Maffra West Upper skews owner-occupied (100%), Tinamba West runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Maffra West Upper edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 968). Maffra West Upper also has a higher family-household share (104% vs 86%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTinamba West vs Maffra West Upper

Common questions

Does Tinamba West or Maffra West Upper have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Maffra West Upper scores 973 vs 968 in Tinamba West. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tinamba West
Metric
Maffra West Upper

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$390/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
63
Population
73
41
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
7
968
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).